<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>collateral estoppel Archives | Amann Burnett Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://amburlaw.com/tag/collateral-estoppel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Special Verdict in State Court Held Insufficient for 11 USC 523, Collateral Estoppel</title>
		<link>https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/</link>
					<comments>https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral estoppel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dischargeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion for Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amburlaw.com/?p=374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Robinson v. Robinson (In re Robinson), 2022 BNH 001 (denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as the findings of… <span class="read-more"><a href="https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/">Read More &#187;</a></span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/">Special Verdict in State Court Held Insufficient for 11 USC 523, Collateral Estoppel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://amburlaw.com">Amann Burnett Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><u>Robinson v. Robinson (In re Robinson)</u>, 2022 BNH 001 (denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as the findings of the Massachusetts state court special verdict were not sufficient for this court to apply collateral estoppel to find the state court judgment debt nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), or (a)(6)).  <a href="https://amburlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-bnh-001-collateral-estoppel-state-court-11-usc-523.pdf">2022-bnh-001 collateral estoppel state court 11 usc 523</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/">Special Verdict in State Court Held Insufficient for 11 USC 523, Collateral Estoppel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://amburlaw.com">Amann Burnett Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://amburlaw.com/special-verdict-in-state-court-held-insufficient-for-11-usc-523-collateral-estoppel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
